Thank you for the huge review! I promise never to stoop to begging again!
*loves on you for more parenthetical observations, even (especially!) "nice doggy" ones*
That one was totally gratuitous, but I'm glad you noticed it because I thought of you as I was writing...
"Drummond and Llewellyn, Investigators"? Now there's a thought...
And bless you for noticing the "over-wound" reference...
I'm glad you thought that paragraph was Watson-like, because Watson is terribly important, even though Holmes gets all the good roles.
AND OH MY GOD. BLACK. And yet I still suspect foul play - dare he be innocent of this crime, at least? - even though he's an uncompromising old bat.
I just love capslocks reactions to this revelation - and the different spins people put on it. Though again, I cannot possibly comment: it is a great mistake to theorise ahead of one's data!
Thanks again for the review - what a nice surprise!
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2007-08-28 07:42 pm (UTC)*loves on you for more parenthetical observations, even (especially!) "nice doggy" ones*
That one was totally gratuitous, but I'm glad you noticed it because I thought of you as I was writing...
"Drummond and Llewellyn, Investigators"? Now there's a thought...
And bless you for noticing the "over-wound" reference...
I'm glad you thought that paragraph was Watson-like, because Watson is terribly important, even though Holmes gets all the good roles.
AND OH MY GOD. BLACK. And yet I still suspect foul play - dare he be innocent of this crime, at least? - even though he's an uncompromising old bat.
I just love capslocks reactions to this revelation - and the different spins people put on it. Though again, I cannot possibly comment: it is a great mistake to theorise ahead of one's data!
Thanks again for the review - what a nice surprise!